文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Nie, Junjun ¹ ; Sun, Lin ¹ ; Zhan, Lijie ¹ ; Li, Xue ³ ; Hou, Wenting ¹ ; Zhang, Yanjun ¹ ; Li, Weijiang ¹ ; Zhang, Dongmei ¹ ; Cui, Zhengpeng ¹ ; Li, Zhenhuai ¹ ; Xu, Shizhen ¹ ; Dai, Jianlong ¹ ; Dong, Hezhong ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.Shandong Acad Agr Sci, Inst Ind Crops, Jinan 250100, Shandong, Peoples R China

2.Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Agron, State Key Lab North China Crop Improvement & Regul, Key Lab Crop Growth Regulat Hebei Prov, Baoding 071000, Peoples R China

3.Shandong Mental Hlth Ctr, Jinan 253200, Shandong, Peoples R China

4.Shihezi Univ, Agr Coll, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, Peoples R China

关键词： Cotton; Vegetative branching; Sympodial branching; Compensatory growth; Canopy photosynthesis; Dry matter partitioning

期刊名称：FIELD CROPS RESEARCH （ 影响因子：5.8； 五年影响因子：6.9 ）

ISSN： 0378-4290

年卷期： 2023 年 302 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Context: Cotton has a complex branching pattern including sympodial and vegetative branching. Traditionally managed cotton mainly depends on sympodial branching for formation of yield-contributing fruit. Whether seedcotton yield based solely on vegetative branching is comparable with that based solely on sympodial or both types of branching is unclear. Objective: The study determined how terminal removal at first square to avoid formation of sympodial branches (SBs) regulated vegetative branching and yield under different plant densities. Methods: A two-year split-plot design field experiment had main plots with plant density (4.5 and 9.0 plants m-2) and subplots with plant pruning mode. Pruning modes were terminal removal at first square (TRS) to avoid formation of sympodial branches but retain only vegetative branches (VBs), removal of VBs (RVB) to retain only SBs, and no pruning (CK), with both branch types remaining intact. Canopy photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and partitioning, and seedcotton yield and yield components were examined. Results: At low plant density (4.5 plants m-2), compared with other pruning modes, TRS increased seedcotton yield and biological yield but did not affect harvest index. At high plant density (9.0 plants m-2), compared with other pruning modes, TRS decreased seedcotton yield and harvest index, although biological yield increased. The yield increase with TRS at low plant density was attributed to the increase in biological yield, which was due to significantly higher canopy photosynthesis with TRS than with other pruning modes. At high plant density, photosynthesis with TRS was higher than that with no pruning at peak boll-setting and boll-opening stages and higher than that with RVB from peak squaring to boll-opening. Compared with other pruning modes, TRS increased dry matter partitioning to vegetative organs but decreased partitioning to reproductive organs. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between canopy apparent photosynthesis and biological yield, biomass partitioning, and harvest index, irrespective of plant pruning and plant density. Conclusion: Plant pruning and plant density interacted to affect seedcotton yield. With TRS, cotton yield at low plant density was higher than that with other pruning modes, which was attributed to an increase in biological yield associated with an increase in canopy photosynthesis. At high plant density, the yield decrease with TRS was attributed to low harvest index associated with reduced reproductive partitioning. Implications: Cotton cultivation relying solely on vegetative branching can be an alternative to obtain moderate yields and economic benefits under conditions of low plant density.