文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Zhang, Yanjun ¹ ; Zhang, Yongjiang ² ; Liu, Guangya ¹ ; Xu, Shizhen ¹ ; Dai, Jianlong ¹ ; Li, Weijiang ¹ ; Li, Zhenhua ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.Shandong Acad Agr Sci, Cotton Res Ctr, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China

2.Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Agron, State Key Lab North China Crop Improvement & Regu, Key Lab Crop Growth Regulat Hebei Prov, Baoding 071000, Peoples R China

3.Shandong Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China

4.Shandong Agr Univ, Coll Agron, Tai An 271000, Shandong, Peoples R China

关键词： Cotton; Waterlogging; Nitric oxide; Physiological event; Gene expression

期刊名称：FIELD CROPS RESEARCH （ 影响因子：5.224； 五年影响因子：6.19 ）

ISSN： 0378-4290

年卷期： 2021 年 261 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Waterlogging is a major abiotic stress that reduces crop growth and productivity. Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential signaling molecule involved in abiotic stress responses in many plant species. However, it is unclear if and how NO mitigates waterlogging stress in field-grown cotton. In this study, the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or its scavenger 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO) was foliarapplied to waterlogged and non-waterlogged cotton plants. The NO concentrations in different plant parts, plant growth, yield and yield components, as well as related physiological and molecular events, were examined over three consecutive years under field conditions. Foliar application of SNP increased NO concentration in leaves by 83.6 and roots by 80.2 % under waterlogging, while cPTIO decreased the NO concentration by 18.9 and 5.3 %, respectively. Biomass and lint yield were reduced by 17.2 and 36.0 % under waterlogging without the application of SNP or cPTIO, but the reductions were 8.8 and 28.4 % following SNP application and 29.5 and 43.4 % respectively, following cPTIO application. Foliar applied SNP increased biomass by 10.2 % and lint yield by 12.0 % under waterlogging, whereas cPTIO caused 5.0 and 11.5 % reductions in biomass and lint yield. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that the SNP up-regulated the NO synthesis gene (GhNIR), but down regulated the genes involved in glycolysis and fermentation (GhADH2 and GhPDC), ethylene production (GhACO and GhACS8), and abscisic acid (ABA) synthesis (GhNCED2). It also reduced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production and malonaldehyde (MDA) content in the leaves, but increased the leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate. The levels of auxin (IAA) and gibberellic acid (GA) were increased by SNP but those of ABA and ethylene contents as well as the activities of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) in leaves were decreased. The cPTIO showed an opposite effect to SNP in almost all physiological and molecular responses to waterlogging. The overall results indicated that increasing the concentrations of NO in plant tissues via the foliar application of SNP mitigates waterlogging stress through a series of physiological and molecular events, ultimately reducing biological and lint yield loss under waterlogging. Therefore, increasing the concentration of NO in plant tissues by genetic breeding or agronomic measures might be a potential strategy for improving waterlogging tolerance and reducing yield loss in cotton.